Who goes first? Strategic delay under information asymmetry
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper considers a timing game in which heterogeneously informed agents have the option to delay an investment strategically to learn about its uncertain return from the experience of others. I study the effects of information exchange through strategic delay on longrun beliefs and outcomes. Investment decisions are delayed when the information structure prohibits informational cascades. When there is only moderate inequality in the distribution of information, equilibrium beliefs converge in the long-run, and there is an insufficient aggregate investment relative to the efficient benchmark. When the distribution of information is more skewed, there can be a persistent wedge in posterior beliefs between well and poorly informed agents, because the poorly informed tend to “drive out” the well-informed. ∗I am indebted to Martin Osborne, Colin Stewart, Ettore Damiano, Pauli Murto, Sven Rady, three anonymous referees, as well as participants at the European Econometric Society Meeting for valuable discussions, helpful comments and suggestions. Financial support by the German Science Foundation (DFG) through SFB/TR 15 is gratefully acknowledged. †Department of Economics, University of Bonn, Germany
منابع مشابه
Who goes first? Strategic Delay and Learning by Waiting
This paper considers a “war of attrition” game in which agents learn about an uncertain state of the world through private signals and from their peers. I provide existence and uniqueness results for a class of equilibria that satisfy a “full-participation” condition, and show that asymmetries in the distribution of information can lead to excessive stopping and an oversupply of information rel...
متن کاملStrategic Delay and Efficiency in Global Games
The global games literature shows that perturbing a complete information coordination game with correlated private information unleashes strategic uncertainty that can act, in domino fashion, to rule out all but a single dominance-solvable equilibrium. We show (in a two-player model) that when players also have the option to delay acting, the domino chain is broken, and multiple equilibria resu...
متن کاملSign Effect, Speedup – Delay Asymmetry and Gender Effect In the Tehran Stock Exchange
The present study first investigates the asymmetry of speedup - delay (gain and loss) and Sign Effect in Tehran Stock Exchange, then examine the effect of gender on the discount rate and explain it with the loss aversion. The sample is 403 investors in Tehran Stock Exchange, and the nonparametric Tests are used to test the research hypotheses. The research results show that there is an asymmetr...
متن کاملStrategic Asymmetry in Dynamic Coordination Games with Learning
This paper studies a simple model of dynamic coordination with learning under incomplete information. We show that strategic asymmetry arises where the predecessor’s strategy is a strategic substitute for the successor’s while the latter is a strategic complement for the former. The role of dynamics and learning is identified by comparing the strategic interactions in the coordination games wit...
متن کاملComputational Asymmetry in Strategic Bayesian Networks
Among the strategic choices made by today’s economic actors are choices about algorithms and computational resources. Different access to computational resources may result in a kind of economic asymmetry analogous to information asymmetry. In order to represent strategic computational choices within a game theoretic framework, we propose a new game specification, Strategic Bayesian Networks (S...
متن کامل